Setting up various methods for Ubuntu file sharing has become easier over the years. In this article, I’ll highlight several of the available Ubuntu file sharing options. I’ll also point out where to find them and provide links for downloads.
Perhaps the best option for Ubuntu users looking to share files across their local network is NFS (Network File System). Unlike other file sharing options for Ubuntu, NFS is designed for Linux environments. It is also the best-designed option for long-term networked directory shares. NFS is popular with Linux distributions and Network Attached Storage (NAS) servers thanks to its stability and its overall speed.
NFS is widely considered to be the preferred method for sharing files throughout a Linux-specific network. And setup, while a bit detailed, is perfectly duplicable thanks to the great Ubuntu file sharing guide linked above.
The downside to relying on NFS is that it’s not really a cross-platform file sharing solution. To better clarify, OS X NFS support is pretty good and Windows NFS support is also fair. But you should be warned — NFS isn’t necessarily the best solution for cross-platform needs. Despite its speed advantages, it’s a network setup best suited for permanent network deployments instead of casual directory sharing.
Samba is an alternative networking implementation, which is both cross-platform and supports file sharing with printer sharing capabilities. Samba is a robust networking option that is commonly used among home users and those needing to mix their printer and file sharing together under one solution.
Some consider Samba easier to setup than NFS. I tend to disagree with this, especially if you’re actually verifying your Samba settings to make sure everything is set up according to the Samba for Ubuntu documentation, because it’s a lengthy process.
In the above section discussing NFS, I mentioned that NFS is faster than Samba. This isn’t always the case, as in some instances, you may find that Samba is actually out-performing NFS. I recommend running tests with both NFS and Samba to see which one is performing best for your network.
Getting Samba set up with other operating systems is fairly simple. OS X Samba support is fairly straightforward, while Windows Samba support is a bit more convoluted, depending on the version of Windows you happen to be connecting to.
The downside to using Samba for file sharing really comes down to the amazing number of methods for setting it up. A basic setup can be as simple as choosing to share a directory via nautilus-share or something complex such as using Samba as a domain controller. For a newer Ubuntu user, this is a lot to take in.
To make matters worse, the Ubuntu documentation divides the server and client guides into separate sections, which only adds to the confusion. With those points aside, the actual setup for a basic Samba setup from Ubuntu PC to Ubuntu PC is actually quite easy.
Because I don’t consider NFS or Samba to be a secure method of file sharing between computers, SSHFS for Ubuntu is something that I feel needs to be covered here. As you may already know, SSH is a widely trusted method of connecting two separate computers for remote control tasks on another machine. What makes SSHFS so awesome, is that you gain all of the encrypted communication advantages offered by SSH in a locally mounted file system.
Setting up SSH on Ubuntu is a bit involved; however, it’s not really any more difficult than setting up a NFS server. Mounting a remote directory using SSHFS, on the other hand, is extremely simple on its own. Because SSH is set up out of the box to time out after an extended period of time, it’s important to make sure you’ve set up a server keep alive option. Adding ServerAliveInterval 5 to the server or the client, will ensure your mounted file system doesn’t time out due to inactivity.
The only real downside to using SSHFS is in the SSH setup itself. Speed can be another factor as files being placed inside of a SSHFS mounted directory aren’t always as fast as other file sharing methods. SSHFS for Windows requires the use of a Windows client called Dokan, while OS X users, will need to use FUSE for OS X.
For an Ubuntu user interested in sending only one file at a time between PCs, NitroShare is a great file sharing solution. Unlike the options listed above, NitroShare allows you to share individual files, not directories, with other PCs. So if you’re needing to share a mounted directory between two PCs, this wouldn’t be the option for you. This tool would more closely resemble someone handing you a single item whereas Samba, NFS and SSHFS are closer to using a shared container.
The NitroShare application is available for Ubuntu (and other Linux distros), OS X and Windows. Unlike any of the directory sharing options listed above, this is simply an application which requires next to no configuration at all. It is a good choice if you only wish to share specific items between PCs and have no desire to network those same PCs together.
Ubuntu One is a cloud-based storage solution provided for Ubuntu users and supported by Canonical. It offers Ubuntu users a means of sharing files and even directories over a local network, in addition to making the same content available off-site as well. Available as both a limited-capacity free option or a higher-capacity paid solution, Ubuntu One is quite useful for those looking to keep PC content available in the cloud.
Unfortunately, it’s not really going to be a viable option for other platforms. While there is a Windows client that has been recently made available, sadly, other Linux distributions and OS X lack the option to sync with Ubuntu One. If you’re looking for a very Ubuntu-centric means of syncing up your Ubuntu files and directories and understand the storage limitations based on what you wish to spend, then perhaps Ubuntu One is a good option for you.
The last option I want to mention is a cloud-based file sharing service called Dropbox. Similar to Ubuntu One, Dropbox differs in that you can use it on any Linux distribution, OS X or Windows.
Like Ubuntu One, Dropbox gives users a finite amount of storage. Should the need for more storage space arise, you can always expand how much Dropbox will handle by purchasing more space. The only real difference between Dropbox and Ubuntu One from a file sharing standpoint is that Dropbox is genuinely, cross platform where Ubuntu One isn’t quite there just yet.
Now that I’ve laid out ample options, I’ll conclude this article with a guide to help you choose the Ubuntu file sharing solution that’s going to work best for you.
Free and do it yourself: NFS, Samba and SSHFS are you best choices. If speed matters to you, you might want to consider NFS or Samba.
Paid and easy: Dropbox is the best option without question. While there are other solutions out there similar to Dropbox, I’ve found that when I need directories to sync between computers without hassles or errors, Dropbox is the way to go. If you use Ubuntu-based systems exclusively, then perhaps Ubuntu One is something to consider. If you’re simply looking to share individual files occasionally between PCs, then the last option would be to consider NitroShare.
Huawei’s AI Update: Things Are Moving Faster Than We Think
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
December 04, 2020
Keeping Machine Learning Algorithms Honest in the ‘Ethics-First’ Era
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
November 18, 2020
Key Trends in Chatbots and RPA
FEATURE | By Guest Author,
November 10, 2020
FEATURE | By Samuel Greengard,
November 05, 2020
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
November 02, 2020
How Intel’s Work With Autonomous Cars Could Redefine General Purpose AI
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
October 29, 2020
Dell Technologies World: Weaving Together Human And Machine Interaction For AI And Robotics
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
October 23, 2020
The Super Moderator, or How IBM Project Debater Could Save Social Media
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
October 16, 2020
FEATURE | By Cynthia Harvey,
October 07, 2020
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
October 05, 2020
CIOs Discuss the Promise of AI and Data Science
FEATURE | By Guest Author,
September 25, 2020
Microsoft Is Building An AI Product That Could Predict The Future
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 25, 2020
Top 10 Machine Learning Companies 2020
FEATURE | By Cynthia Harvey,
September 22, 2020
NVIDIA and ARM: Massively Changing The AI Landscape
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
September 18, 2020
Continuous Intelligence: Expert Discussion [Video and Podcast]
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By James Maguire,
September 14, 2020
Artificial Intelligence: Governance and Ethics [Video]
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By James Maguire,
September 13, 2020
IBM Watson At The US Open: Showcasing The Power Of A Mature Enterprise-Class AI
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 11, 2020
Artificial Intelligence: Perception vs. Reality
FEATURE | By James Maguire,
September 09, 2020
Anticipating The Coming Wave Of AI Enhanced PCs
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 05, 2020
The Critical Nature Of IBM’s NLP (Natural Language Processing) Effort
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
August 14, 2020
Datamation is the leading industry resource for B2B data professionals and technology buyers. Datamation's focus is on providing insight into the latest trends and innovation in AI, data security, big data, and more, along with in-depth product recommendations and comparisons. More than 1.7M users gain insight and guidance from Datamation every year.
Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on Datamation and our other data and technology-focused platforms.
Advertise with Us
Property of TechnologyAdvice.
© 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved
Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this
site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives
compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products
appear on this site including, for example, the order in which
they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies
or all types of products available in the marketplace.