I’m angry about our inability to police ourselves against self-inflicted wounds. I’ve been at this for a lot of years and I cannot believe how often the same problems repeat themselves and how otherwise impressive companies find it impossible to get the most basics things right. Why is the business technology learning curve so damn flat?
Not long ago I visited a large company that had 11 ERP systems and 19 instances of them. Shortly after that I found myself talking with technology executives about their failed attempts to standardize their hardware, and right after that I helped a company think about how they should train their business technology professionals to think more about the business value of technology. I then found myself talking with some CIOs about whether they should think about outsourcing desktop support and their help desks.
Is it me, or are these issues like ten years old? Where the hell has everyone been, and why is it still so hard to practice discipline in the acquisition, deployment and support of technology?
Related Articles |
Web 2.0, Sea Changes and the Enterprise |
I told the CIO of the company with the 11/19 ERP problem that I could guarantee $250M to the company’s bottom line if he’d agree to practice some discipline. I know, I know, you think that $250M is an exaggeration: I assure you that it is not. The company in question has an annual global IT budget of over $2B and is wasting a ton of money on the installation, support and maintenance of unnecessary hardware and software.
I can guarantee a $250M savings if the company commits to a disciplined approach to standardization and deployment that would forbid the deployment of redundant applications. Hell, I even offered to forgo a consulting fee to make it happen, offering instead to take a percentage of the savings that was actually achieved – a completely risk free deal. They declined.
Why?
Why do companies continue to make the same mistakes year after year?
Well, the answer is almost too simple – and equally exasperating: they just can’t bring themselves to tell people things they don’t want to hear. Reducing the number of ERP applications “might upset some people” – I was actually told. Standardization makes people angry. People don’t like being told what to do, I’ve been told a million times. Of course, these same people complain all the time about the cost of technology, arguing that IT should be cheaper every year because, after all, IT’s all been commoditized.
Enough of this stupidity. We all learn early in life that we can’t have it both ways. Either we adhere to best practices or we pay the price. I really resent management’s insistence that technology costs be reduced when they fail to discipline the acquisition, deployment or support processes. I really resent the CIOs and CTOs that don’t have the courage to make the tough political calls when their corporate cultures might support these calls. There’s no excuse for the lack of discipline which is sometimes avoided just to avoid tough conversations with the boys – who I guess might not tell the bearer of bad news about Saturday’s tee time. An even more serious concern is for the shareholders of public companies that waste millions and in some cases billions of dollars on perfectly avoidable technology mistakes. Who is accountable to them?
It’s epidemic. Too many companies have too many applications, too many servers and too many laptops. Too many CIOs are afraid to make anyone mad. Too many CEOs fail to demand discipline from their technology executives – yet still complain about technology costs.
Much of the “technology-is-hard” crowd doesn’t pay enough attention to the lack of discipline that makes IT so hard! It’s not about performance, reliability or even security. These are solvable problems. The really tough problems are exacerbated by lack of will, poor discipline, our need to be liked, our tendency to avoid conflict, just about everyone’s desire to take the easy way out and our desire to dodge accountability whenever we can.
No one thinks they will end up in the woodshed. Maybe we should bring it back.
Huawei’s AI Update: Things Are Moving Faster Than We Think
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
December 04, 2020
Keeping Machine Learning Algorithms Honest in the ‘Ethics-First’ Era
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
November 18, 2020
Key Trends in Chatbots and RPA
FEATURE | By Guest Author,
November 10, 2020
FEATURE | By Samuel Greengard,
November 05, 2020
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
November 02, 2020
How Intel’s Work With Autonomous Cars Could Redefine General Purpose AI
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
October 29, 2020
Dell Technologies World: Weaving Together Human And Machine Interaction For AI And Robotics
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
October 23, 2020
The Super Moderator, or How IBM Project Debater Could Save Social Media
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
October 16, 2020
FEATURE | By Cynthia Harvey,
October 07, 2020
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Guest Author,
October 05, 2020
CIOs Discuss the Promise of AI and Data Science
FEATURE | By Guest Author,
September 25, 2020
Microsoft Is Building An AI Product That Could Predict The Future
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 25, 2020
Top 10 Machine Learning Companies 2020
FEATURE | By Cynthia Harvey,
September 22, 2020
NVIDIA and ARM: Massively Changing The AI Landscape
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
September 18, 2020
Continuous Intelligence: Expert Discussion [Video and Podcast]
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By James Maguire,
September 14, 2020
Artificial Intelligence: Governance and Ethics [Video]
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By James Maguire,
September 13, 2020
IBM Watson At The US Open: Showcasing The Power Of A Mature Enterprise-Class AI
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 11, 2020
Artificial Intelligence: Perception vs. Reality
FEATURE | By James Maguire,
September 09, 2020
Anticipating The Coming Wave Of AI Enhanced PCs
FEATURE | By Rob Enderle,
September 05, 2020
The Critical Nature Of IBM’s NLP (Natural Language Processing) Effort
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | By Rob Enderle,
August 14, 2020
Datamation is the leading industry resource for B2B data professionals and technology buyers. Datamation's focus is on providing insight into the latest trends and innovation in AI, data security, big data, and more, along with in-depth product recommendations and comparisons. More than 1.7M users gain insight and guidance from Datamation every year.
Advertise with TechnologyAdvice on Datamation and our other data and technology-focused platforms.
Advertise with Us
Property of TechnologyAdvice.
© 2025 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved
Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this
site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives
compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products
appear on this site including, for example, the order in which
they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies
or all types of products available in the marketplace.